Squad loginAt a glance
Event overview
Starting meta leaders
Top 8 breakdown
Published final standingsKevin MurphyOscilio
Sabastian ChizhikBenji, the Piercing Wind
Ethan PhillipsBravo, Flattering Showman
Alex TylerDromai
Darin KeyEnigma
Chandler BushnellBriar
Allen ToweryBravo, Flattering Showman
Jonathan RiddellLexi
Event signals
- Pending matches
- 0
- Byes
- 0
- Last valid refresh
- 2026-08-31T00:03:31+00:00
Hero performance leaders
Minimum 3 matches · draws count as half a win| Hero | Record | Matches | Win rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arakni, Solitary Confinement | 6–2–0 | 8 | 75.0% |
| Benji, the Piercing Wind | 11–4–0 | 15 | 73.3% |
| Kayo, Strong-arm | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% |
| Oldhim | 32–22–0 | 54 | 59.3% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | 26–18–0 | 44 | 59.1% |
| Dromai | 60–43–0 | 103 | 58.2% |
| Oscilio | 47–34–0 | 81 | 58.0% |
| Florian | 8–6–0 | 14 | 57.1% |
Popularity versus results
Representation versus performance
Hero workspace
Briar
Official hero profile
Briar is a Warden of the Rosetta, an Order of powerful spell weavers that once stood alongside the likes of the Ollin and the Seers. Towards the end of the Third Age, the Rosetta suffered heavy casualties at the hands of the Old Ones. When all hope seemed lost, their Queen cast a reckless spellContinue reading "Briar"
Art and profile resources cached from FABTCG · 2026-08-29T17:31:43+00:00What changed?
From #1 to #— in the field
Started with 39 pilots (20.1%) and currently has 0 (0.0%): -39 pilots and -20.1 percentage points. 0/39 original pilots remain.
Pilot records count each player’s result, including both pilots in mirrors. Matchup comparisons exclude mirrors; opponent mix includes them. Byes and pending matches never affect win rate. Drop rate only counts explicit source labels, and placement appears only from published final standings.
Confirmed cuts
Day 2 and Top 8 conversion lift
Round detail
Population and results by round
| Round | Pilots | Field share | Record | Win rate | Retained next | Pending | Byes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 39 | 20.1% | 21–18–0 | 53.9% | 36/39 · 92.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 36 | 20.7% | 20–16–0 | 55.6% | 35/36 · 97.2% | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 35 | 20.8% | 15–20–0 | 42.9% | 30/35 · 85.7% | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 30 | 20.6% | 15–15–0 | 50.0% | 25/30 · 83.3% | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 25 | 21.6% | 15–10–0 | 60.0% | 21/25 · 84.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 21 | 21.4% | 10–11–0 | 47.6% | 18/21 · 85.7% | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 18 | 20.9% | 8–10–0 | 44.4% | 17/18 · 94.4% | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 17 | 22.4% | 8–9–0 | 47.1% | 1/17 · 5.9% | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 12.5% | 0–1–0 | 0.0% | 0/1 · 0.0% | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | 0.0% | 0–0–0 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 0.0% | 0–0–0 | — | — | 0 | 0 |
Opponents
Matchup breakdown
| Opponent | Record | Matches | Win rate | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arakni, Solitary Confinement | 0–1–0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0–79.3% |
| Aurora | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Azalea | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% |
| Blaze, Firemind | 7–5–0 | 12 | 58.3% | 31.9–80.7% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | 3–6–0 | 9 | 33.3% | 12.1–64.6% |
| Chane | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Dash | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% |
| Dorinthea | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% |
| Dromai | 10–15–0 | 25 | 40.0% | 23.4–59.3% |
| Enigma | 8–10–0 | 18 | 44.4% | 24.6–66.3% |
| Fai | 8–4–0 | 12 | 66.7% | 39.1–86.2% |
| Florian | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% |
| Gravy Bones | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% |
| Hala | 2–0–0 | 2 | 100.0% | 34.2–100.0% |
| Iyslander | 4–5–0 | 9 | 44.4% | 18.9–73.3% |
| Kayo, Strong-arm | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% |
| Levia | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Lexi | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% |
| N/A | 2–0–0 | 2 | 100.0% | 34.2–100.0% |
| Oldhim | 2–9–0 | 11 | 18.2% | 5.1–47.7% |
| Olympia | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% |
| Oscilio | 7–11–0 | 18 | 38.9% | 20.3–61.4% |
| Rhinar | 6–3–0 | 9 | 66.7% | 35.4–87.9% |
| Riptide | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% |
| Terra | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% |
| Zen | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
Pilots
Pilot performance distribution
| Record | Pilots |
|---|---|
| 7–2–0 | 1 |
| 6–2–0 | 2 |
| 5–3–0 | 8 |
| 4–4–0 | 4 |
| 3–3–0 | 2 |
| 3–5–0 | 2 |
| 2–2–0 | 4 |
| 2–3–0 | 3 |
| 2–4–0 | 1 |
| 2–5–0 | 1 |
| 1–1–0 | 1 |
| 1–2–0 | 4 |
| 1–3–0 | 1 |
| 1–4–0 | 1 |
| 0–1–0 | 3 |
| 0–3–0 | 1 |
| Player | Record | Win rate | Rounds | Last round | Latest rank | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chandler Bushnell | 7–2–0 | 77.8% | 9 | 9 | 5 | 0 |
| Sebastiano Cavallo | 6–2–0 | 75.0% | 8 | 8 | 22 | 0 |
| Trey Herring | 6–2–0 | 75.0% | 8 | 8 | 23 | 0 |
| Adam Hine | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 30 | 0 |
| Buster Sexton | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 46 | 0 |
| Christopher Iaali | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 25 | 0 |
| Gil Beloate | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 38 | 0 |
| Indie Hansen | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 33 | 0 |
| Michael Cawvey | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 39 | 0 |
| Raine Karan | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 26 | 0 |
| Tho Bui | 5–3–0 | 62.5% | 8 | 8 | 45 | 0 |
| Anthony Camacho | 4–4–0 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 55 | 0 |
| Jacob Gladman | 4–4–0 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 50 | 0 |
| Phillip Spader | 4–4–0 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 52 | 0 |
| Tyler Sorensen | 4–4–0 | 50.0% | 8 | 8 | 63 | 0 |
| Christopher Dietz | 3–3–0 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | Dropped | 0 |
| Chuck Ford | 3–3–0 | 50.0% | 6 | 6 | Dropped | 0 |
| Alexander Schumacher | 3–5–0 | 37.5% | 8 | 8 | 70 | 0 |
| Christiano Cavallo | 3–5–0 | 37.5% | 8 | 8 | 69 | 0 |
| Geoffrey Hunt | 2–2–0 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | Dropped | 0 |
| Logan Petersen | 2–2–0 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | Dropped | 0 |
| Shawn Walker | 2–2–0 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | Dropped | 0 |
| Tyler Battles | 2–2–0 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | Dropped | 0 |
| Craig Krempels | 2–3–0 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | Dropped | 0 |
| Gregory Smith | 2–3–0 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | Dropped | 0 |
| Tony Stobbe | 2–3–0 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | Dropped | 0 |
| Landon De Loach | 2–4–0 | 33.3% | 6 | 6 | Dropped | 0 |
| Andrew Martinez | 2–5–0 | 28.6% | 7 | 7 | Dropped | 0 |
| Darren Rennie | 1–1–0 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | Dropped | 0 |
| Brian Kenyon | 1–2–0 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | Dropped | 0 |
| Dylan Arnold | 1–2–0 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | Dropped | 0 |
| Isaac Brown | 1–2–0 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | Dropped | 0 |
| Todd France | 1–2–0 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | Dropped | 0 |
| Nathan Crawford | 1–3–0 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | Dropped | 0 |
| William Garrison | 1–4–0 | 20.0% | 5 | 5 | Dropped | 0 |
| Kenneth Lyle | 0–3–0 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | Dropped | 0 |
| Daniel White | 0–1–0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | Dropped | 0 |
| Noah Fogle | 0–1–0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | Dropped | 0 |
| Sheena Crawford | 0–1–0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | Dropped | 0 |
Identity changes
Observed hero switches
No hero switches involving Briar were observed.
Field composition
Hero meta
| Hero | Players | Meta | LL points | To LL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 | 20.21% | — | — | |
| 18 | 9.33% | — | — | |
| 13 | 6.74% | — | — | |
| 13 | 6.74% | — | — | |
| 13 | 6.74% | — | — | |
| 12 | 6.22% | — | — | |
| 8 | 4.15% | — | — | |
| 8 | 4.15% | — | — | |
| 7 | 3.63% | — | — | |
| 6 | 3.11% | — | — | |
| 6 | 3.11% | — | — | |
| 5 | 2.59% | — | — | |
| 4 | 2.07% | — | — | |
| 4 | 2.07% | — | — | |
| 4 | 2.07% | — | — | |
| 4 | 2.07% | — | — | |
| 3 | 1.55% | — | — | |
| 3 | 1.55% | — | — | |
| 3 | 1.55% | — | — | |
| 3 | 1.55% | — | — | |
| 2 | 1.04% | — | — | |
| 2 | 1.04% | — | — | |
| 2 | 1.04% | — | — | |
| Unknown | 2 | 1.04% | — | — |
| 2 | 1.04% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — | |
| 1 | 0.52% | — | — |
Evidence-weighted event position
Event meta tier list
This is a descriptive snapshot of which heroes appear best positioned in this event—not an intrinsic power ranking or an official qualification prediction. Results after Round 11 are excluded.
How the tier score works
35%Confidence-adjusted non-mirror performance
25%Confirmed Day 2 or Top 8 conversion lift
15%Same-hero retention versus the field
15%Sampled matchup robustness and coverage
10%Starting representation breadth
Ten neutral results shrink small samples toward 50%. Unavailable cut or matchup components are omitted and their weight is redistributed. Classification requires at least 3 starting pilots and 12 completed non-mirror hero results. S tier additionally requires at least 20 results plus either a Wilson lower bound above 50% or a confirmed cut lift of at least 1.25× with two qualifiers.
S tier
Exceptional event position supported by strong evidence
No hero currently meets this tier’s score and evidence requirements.
A tier
Clearly above-average performance and field position
Oscilio
45–32–0 · n=77Win rate58.4%Adjusted 57.5%
95% interval47.3–68.8%S evidence gate not met
Meta share6.8% → 50.0%13 → 1 pilots
Retention lift7.46×1/13 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.98×TOP8 · 5 advanced
Matchup coverage83.1%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%57.5
Field retention 15.0%100.0
Representation breadth 10.0%57.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%40.5
Cut conversion 25.0%49.1
Why A tier?
- 58.4% observed and 57.5% adjusted across 77 non-mirror results.
- 7.46x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.98x TOP8 representation lift.
- 83.1% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
B tier
Competitive, approximately average event position
Bravo, Flattering Showman
25–17–0 · n=42Win rate59.5%Adjusted 57.7%
95% interval44.5–73.0%S evidence gate met
Meta share3.1% → 0.0%6 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/6 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.70×TOP8 · 4 advanced
Matchup coverage64.3%Worst sampled 33.3%
Adjusted performance 35.0%57.7
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%39.2
Matchup robustness 15.0%50.1
Cut conversion 25.0%85.1
Why B tier?
- 59.5% observed and 57.7% adjusted across 42 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.70x TOP8 representation lift.
- 64.3% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 33.3%.
Oldhim
32–22–0 · n=54Win rate59.3%Adjusted 57.8%
95% interval46.0–71.3%S evidence gate met
Meta share4.2% → 0.0%8 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/8 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.59×TOP8 · 5 advanced
Matchup coverage74.1%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%57.8
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%45.3
Matchup robustness 15.0%40.6
Cut conversion 25.0%79.8
Why B tier?
- 59.3% observed and 57.8% adjusted across 54 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.59x TOP8 representation lift.
- 74.1% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
Dorinthea
11–11–0 · n=22Win rate50.0%Adjusted 50.0%
95% interval30.7–69.3%S evidence gate met
Meta share1.6% → 0.0%3 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/3 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.70×TOP8 · 2 advanced
Matchup coverage45.5%Worst sampled 42.9%
Adjusted performance 35.0%50.0
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%27.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%51.8
Cut conversion 25.0%85.1
Why B tier?
- 50.0% observed and 50.0% adjusted across 22 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.70x TOP8 representation lift.
- 45.5% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 42.9%.
C tier
Below-average results or an unfavorable field trajectory
Dromai
58–41–0 · n=99Win rate58.6%Adjusted 57.8%
95% interval48.7–67.8%S evidence gate not met
Meta share9.4% → 0.0%18 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/18 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.14×TOP8 · 8 advanced
Matchup coverage84.8%Worst sampled 20.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%57.8
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%67.9
Matchup robustness 15.0%45.7
Cut conversion 25.0%56.8
Why C tier?
- 58.6% observed and 57.8% adjusted across 99 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.14x TOP8 representation lift.
- 84.8% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 20.0%.
Briar
89–87–0 · n=176Win rate50.6%Adjusted 50.5%
95% interval43.2–57.9%S evidence gate not met
Meta share20.4% → 0.0%39 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/39 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.11×TOP8 · 17 advanced
Matchup coverage92.0%Worst sampled 18.2%
Adjusted performance 35.0%50.5
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%100.0
Matchup robustness 15.0%39.0
Cut conversion 25.0%55.6
Why C tier?
- 50.6% observed and 50.5% adjusted across 176 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.11x TOP8 representation lift.
- 92.0% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 18.2%.
Azalea
13–10–0 · n=23Win rate56.5%Adjusted 54.5%
95% interval36.8–74.4%S evidence gate met
Meta share2.1% → 0.0%4 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/4 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.28×TOP8 · 2 advanced
Matchup coverage47.8%Worst sampled 42.9%
Adjusted performance 35.0%54.5
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%32.0
Matchup robustness 15.0%50.2
Cut conversion 25.0%63.8
Why C tier?
- 56.5% observed and 54.5% adjusted across 23 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.28x TOP8 representation lift.
- 47.8% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 42.9%.
Enigma
36–37–0 · n=73Win rate49.3%Adjusted 49.4%
95% interval38.2–60.5%S evidence gate met
Meta share6.8% → 0.0%13 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/13 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.37×TOP8 · 7 advanced
Matchup coverage75.3%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%49.4
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%57.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%36.4
Cut conversion 25.0%68.7
Why C tier?
- 49.3% observed and 49.4% adjusted across 73 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.37x TOP8 representation lift.
- 75.3% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
Chane
10–11–0 · n=21Win rate47.6%Adjusted 48.4%
95% interval28.3–67.6%S evidence gate met
Meta share2.1% → 0.0%4 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/4 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.28×TOP8 · 2 advanced
Matchup coverage57.1%Worst sampled 25.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%48.4
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%32.0
Matchup robustness 15.0%41.9
Cut conversion 25.0%63.8
Why C tier?
- 47.6% observed and 48.4% adjusted across 21 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.28x TOP8 representation lift.
- 57.1% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 25.0%.
Iyslander
20–25–0 · n=45Win rate44.4%Adjusted 45.5%
95% interval30.9–58.8%S evidence gate met
Meta share4.2% → 0.0%8 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/8 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.28×TOP8 · 4 advanced
Matchup coverage64.4%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%45.5
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%45.3
Matchup robustness 15.0%32.2
Cut conversion 25.0%63.8
Why C tier?
- 44.4% observed and 45.5% adjusted across 45 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.28x TOP8 representation lift.
- 64.4% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
D tier
Substantially underperforming in the observed event
Levia
9–8–0 · n=17Win rate52.9%Adjusted 51.9%
95% interval31.0–73.8%S evidence gate not met
Meta share1.6% → 0.0%3 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/3 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.85×TOP8 · 1 advanced
Matchup coverage23.5%Worst sampled 75.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%51.9
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%27.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%55.9
Cut conversion 25.0%42.5
Why D tier?
- 52.9% observed and 51.9% adjusted across 17 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.85x TOP8 representation lift.
- 23.5% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 75.0%.
Florian
8–6–0 · n=14Win rate57.1%Adjusted 54.2%
95% interval32.6–78.6%S evidence gate not met
Meta share1.6% → 0.0%3 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/3 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.85×TOP8 · 1 advanced
Matchup coverage0.0%No cell reaches n=3
Adjusted performance 41.2%54.2
Field retention 17.6%0.0
Representation breadth 11.8%27.7
Cut conversion 29.4%42.5
Why D tier?
- 57.1% observed and 54.2% adjusted across 14 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.85x TOP8 representation lift.
Olympia
15–17–0 · n=32Win rate46.9%Adjusted 47.6%
95% interval30.9–63.5%S evidence gate not met
Meta share3.1% → 0.0%6 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/6 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.85×TOP8 · 2 advanced
Matchup coverage56.2%Worst sampled 25.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%47.6
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%39.2
Matchup robustness 15.0%43.0
Cut conversion 25.0%42.5
Why D tier?
- 46.9% observed and 47.6% adjusted across 32 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.85x TOP8 representation lift.
- 56.2% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 25.0%.
Lexi
9–16–0 · n=25Win rate36.0%Adjusted 40.0%
95% interval20.2–55.5%S evidence gate not met
Meta share2.6% → 0.0%5 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/5 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift1.02×TOP8 · 2 advanced
Matchup coverage24.0%Worst sampled 33.3%
Adjusted performance 35.0%40.0
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%35.8
Matchup robustness 15.0%46.0
Cut conversion 25.0%51.0
Why D tier?
- 36.0% observed and 40.0% adjusted across 25 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 1.02x TOP8 representation lift.
- 24.0% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 33.3%.
Fai
24–28–0 · n=52Win rate46.1%Adjusted 46.8%
95% interval33.3–59.5%S evidence gate not met
Meta share6.3% → 0.0%12 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/12 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.64×TOP8 · 3 advanced
Matchup coverage63.5%Worst sampled 25.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%46.8
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%55.5
Matchup robustness 15.0%43.8
Cut conversion 25.0%31.9
Why D tier?
- 46.2% observed and 46.8% adjusted across 52 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.64x TOP8 representation lift.
- 63.5% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 25.0%.
Aurora
12–11–0 · n=23Win rate52.2%Adjusted 51.5%
95% interval33.0–70.8%S evidence gate not met
Meta share2.1% → 0.0%4 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/4 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.64×TOP8 · 1 advanced
Matchup coverage34.8%Worst sampled 25.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%51.5
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%32.0
Matchup robustness 15.0%44.1
Cut conversion 25.0%31.9
Why D tier?
- 52.2% observed and 51.5% adjusted across 23 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.64x TOP8 representation lift.
- 34.8% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 25.0%.
Blaze, Firemind
21–36–0 · n=57Win rate36.8%Adjusted 38.8%
95% interval25.5–49.8%S evidence gate not met
Meta share6.8% → 0.0%13 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/13 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.59×TOP8 · 3 advanced
Matchup coverage71.9%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%38.8
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%57.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%30.0
Cut conversion 25.0%29.4
Why D tier?
- 36.8% observed and 38.8% adjusted across 57 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.59x TOP8 representation lift.
- 71.9% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
Rhinar
14–18–0 · n=32Win rate43.8%Adjusted 45.2%
95% interval28.2–60.7%S evidence gate not met
Meta share3.7% → 0.0%7 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/7 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.36×TOP8 · 1 advanced
Matchup coverage59.4%Worst sampled 0.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%45.2
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%42.4
Matchup robustness 15.0%38.6
Cut conversion 25.0%18.2
Why D tier?
- 43.8% observed and 45.2% adjusted across 32 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.36x TOP8 representation lift.
- 59.4% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 0.0%.
Dash
6–10–0 · n=16Win rate37.5%Adjusted 42.3%
95% interval18.5–61.4%S evidence gate not met
Meta share1.6% → 0.0%3 → 0 pilots
Retention lift0.00×0/3 original pilots remain on hero
Cut lift0.00×TOP8 · 0 advanced
Matchup coverage31.2%Worst sampled 20.0%
Adjusted performance 35.0%42.3
Field retention 15.0%0.0
Representation breadth 10.0%27.7
Matchup robustness 15.0%40.6
Cut conversion 25.0%0.0
Why D tier?
- 37.5% observed and 42.3% adjusted across 16 non-mirror results.
- 0.00x relative field retention through Round 11.
- 0.00x TOP8 representation lift.
- 31.2% matchup coverage; worst sampled cell 20.0%.
Insufficient data · 12 heroes
These heroes are deliberately left unclassified rather than being treated as D tier.
Terra4 starting pilots · 9 resultsneeds 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 9
Benji, the Piercing Wind2 starting pilots · 15 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 2
Boltyn2 starting pilots · 13 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 2
Riptide2 starting pilots · 9 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 2 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 9
Zen2 starting pilots · 11 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 2 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 11
Arakni, Solitary Confinement1 starting pilot · 8 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 8
Gravy Bones1 starting pilot · 5 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 5
Hala1 starting pilot · 8 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 8
Kayo, Strong-arm1 starting pilot · 5 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 5
Nuu1 starting pilot · 8 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 8
Pleiades1 starting pilot · 4 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 4
Teklovossen1 starting pilot · 1 resultsneeds 3 starting pilots; observed 1 · needs 12 completed non-mirror results; observed 1
Field survival
Round-over-round conversion
Confirmed cuts
Conversion lift
Show conversion lift table
| Cut | Hero | Starting share | Cut share | Conversion | Lift | Actual qualifiers | Expected | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOP8 · R8 | Arakni, Solitary Confinement | 0.52% | 1.32% | 100.0% | 2.55× | 1 | 0.39 | +0.61 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Hala | 0.52% | 1.32% | 100.0% | 2.55× | 1 | 0.39 | +0.61 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Nuu | 0.52% | 1.32% | 100.0% | 2.55× | 1 | 0.39 | +0.61 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 3.09% | 5.26% | 66.7% | 1.70× | 4 | 2.35 | +1.65 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Dorinthea | 1.55% | 2.63% | 66.7% | 1.70× | 2 | 1.18 | +0.82 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Oldhim | 4.12% | 6.58% | 62.5% | 1.59× | 5 | 3.13 | +1.87 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Enigma | 6.70% | 9.21% | 53.9% | 1.37× | 7 | 5.09 | +1.91 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Iyslander | 4.12% | 5.26% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 4 | 3.13 | +0.87 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Azalea | 2.06% | 2.63% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 2 | 1.57 | +0.43 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Chane | 2.06% | 2.63% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 2 | 1.57 | +0.43 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Benji, the Piercing Wind | 1.03% | 1.32% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 1 | 0.78 | +0.22 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Boltyn | 1.03% | 1.32% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 1 | 0.78 | +0.22 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Zen | 1.03% | 1.32% | 50.0% | 1.28× | 1 | 0.78 | +0.22 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Dromai | 9.28% | 10.53% | 44.4% | 1.14× | 8 | 7.05 | +0.95 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Briar | 20.10% | 22.37% | 43.6% | 1.11× | 17 | 15.28 | +1.72 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Lexi | 2.58% | 2.63% | 40.0% | 1.02× | 2 | 1.96 | +0.04 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Oscilio | 6.70% | 6.58% | 38.5% | 0.98× | 5 | 5.09 | -0.09 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Olympia | 3.09% | 2.63% | 33.3% | 0.85× | 2 | 2.35 | -0.35 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Florian | 1.55% | 1.32% | 33.3% | 0.85× | 1 | 1.18 | -0.18 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Levia | 1.55% | 1.32% | 33.3% | 0.85× | 1 | 1.18 | -0.18 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Fai | 6.19% | 3.95% | 25.0% | 0.64× | 3 | 4.70 | -1.70 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Aurora | 2.06% | 1.32% | 25.0% | 0.64× | 1 | 1.57 | -0.57 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Blaze, Firemind | 6.70% | 3.95% | 23.1% | 0.59× | 3 | 5.09 | -2.09 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Rhinar | 3.61% | 1.32% | 14.3% | 0.36× | 1 | 2.74 | -1.74 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Terra | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 1.57 | -1.57 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Dash | 1.55% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 1.18 | -1.18 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Riptide | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 0.78 | -0.78 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Gravy Bones | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 0.39 | -0.39 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Kayo, Strong-arm | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 0.39 | -0.39 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Pleiades | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 0.39 | -0.39 |
| TOP8 · R8 | Teklovossen | 0.52% | 0.00% | 0.0% | 0.00× | 0 | 0.39 | -0.39 |
Standings context
Bubble tracker
These are the published standings nearest each cut position. For Day 2, the tracker applies the official greater-of rule: Top X or all players with an X-2-or-better listed record. The opponent-strength proxy is not official strength of schedule. These views do not predict qualification; ties, penalties, incomplete coverage, and official GEM data can change the actual cut.
TOP8
After Round 7 · boundary begins Round 8Top 8 area
| Rank | Player | Hero | Listed wins | Opponent-strength proxy | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Darin Key | Enigma | 6 | 63.3% (n=7) | 4 above |
| 5 | Sabastian Chizhik | Benji, the Piercing Wind | 6 | 53.1% (n=7) | 3 above |
| 6 | Allen Towery | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 6 | 47.5% (n=7) | 2 above |
| 7 | Bryce Stroyek | Oldhim | 6 | 66.3% (n=7) | 1 above |
| 8 | Jonathan Riddell | Lexi | 6 | 59.6% (n=7) | At effective line |
| 9 | Chandler Bushnell | Briar | 6 | 63.3% (n=7) | 1 below |
| 10 | Josef Mendez | Levia | 6 | 54.1% (n=7) | 2 below |
| 11 | Jamie Seaborn | Enigma | 6 | 49.9% (n=7) | 3 below |
| 12 | Michael Hamilton | Oscilio | 5 | 65.8% (n=7) | 4 below |
| 13 | Kyle McKeough | Olympia | 5 | 65.3% (n=7) | 5 below |
| 14 | Mara Faris | Dromai | 5 | 60.5% (n=7) | 6 below |
| 15 | Daniel Devine | Blaze, Firemind | 5 | 55.8% (n=7) | 7 below |
| 16 | Luke Shinn | Dromai | 5 | 60.1% (n=7) | 8 below |
Set Day 2 or Top 8 boundary
Suggested for 194 players: Top 48 or all X-2 or better · Day 2 begins Round 8 · Top 8 begins Round 12.
ⓘ For Up to 224 players, the Calling constructed table specifies 7 Day 1 Swiss rounds, Top 48 or all X-2 or better, and 4 Day 2 Swiss rounds. Day 2 therefore starts at Round 8; Top 8 is suggested after all Swiss rounds at Round 12. Official event structure ↗Head to head
Hero matchups
Matchup coverage by hero
Share of each hero's completed results in opponent cells with at least 3 matches. This does not change with the win-rate filter.| Hero | Covered results | Total results | Coverage | Best sampled | Worst sampled |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arakni, Solitary Confinement | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Aurora | 8 | 23 | 34.8% | Dromai · 50.0% (n=4) | Briar · 25.0% (n=4) |
| Azalea | 11 | 23 | 47.8% | Enigma · 75.0% (n=4) | Briar · 42.9% (n=7) |
| Benji, the Piercing Wind | 7 | 15 | 46.7% | Enigma · 75.0% (n=4) | Dromai · 66.7% (n=3) |
| Blaze, Firemind | 41 | 58 | 70.7% | Oldhim · 66.7% (n=3) | Oscilio · 0.0% (n=4) |
| Boltyn | 3 | 13 | 23.1% | Dromai · 33.3% (n=3) | Dromai · 33.3% (n=3) |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | 27 | 43 | 62.8% | Dromai · 80.0% (n=5) | Fai · 33.3% (n=3) |
| Briar | 185 | 199 | 93.0% | Zen · 100.0% (n=3) | Oldhim · 18.2% (n=11) |
| Chane | 12 | 21 | 57.1% | Briar · 50.0% (n=4) | Fai · 25.0% (n=4) |
| Dash | 5 | 16 | 31.2% | Briar · 20.0% (n=5) | Briar · 20.0% (n=5) |
| Dorinthea | 10 | 22 | 45.5% | Oscilio · 100.0% (n=3) | Briar · 42.9% (n=7) |
| Dromai | 84 | 101 | 83.2% | Enigma · 100.0% (n=6) | Bravo, Flattering Showman · 20.0% (n=5) |
| Enigma | 55 | 75 | 73.3% | Oldhim · 100.0% (n=3) | Dromai · 0.0% (n=6) |
| Fai | 36 | 55 | 65.5% | Chane · 75.0% (n=4) | Dromai · 25.0% (n=4) |
| Florian | 0 | 14 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Gravy Bones | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Hala | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Iyslander | 29 | 45 | 64.4% | Briar · 55.6% (n=9) | Oldhim · 0.0% (n=3) |
| Kayo, Strong-arm | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Levia | 4 | 17 | 23.5% | Briar · 75.0% (n=4) | Briar · 75.0% (n=4) |
| Lexi | 6 | 25 | 24.0% | Dromai · 33.3% (n=6) | Dromai · 33.3% (n=6) |
| N/A | 0 | 6 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Nuu | 0 | 8 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Oldhim | 40 | 54 | 74.1% | Iyslander · 100.0% (n=3) | Enigma · 0.0% (n=3) |
| Olympia | 18 | 32 | 56.2% | Blaze, Firemind · 66.7% (n=3) | Dromai · 25.0% (n=4) |
| Oscilio | 64 | 79 | 81.0% | Blaze, Firemind · 100.0% (n=4) | Dorinthea · 0.0% (n=3) |
| Pleiades | 3 | 4 | 75.0% | Oscilio · 33.3% (n=3) | Oscilio · 33.3% (n=3) |
| Rhinar | 19 | 33 | 57.6% | Enigma · 100.0% (n=3) | Oscilio · 0.0% (n=3) |
| Riptide | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Teklovossen | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Terra | 0 | 9 | 0.0% | — | — |
| Zen | 3 | 11 | 27.3% | Briar · 0.0% (n=3) | Briar · 0.0% (n=3) |
Detailed matchup cells
110 of 390 cells meet the active sample threshold before the win-rate filter.| Hero | Opponent | Record | Matches | Win rate | 95% interval |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aurora | Briar | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Aurora | Dromai | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Azalea | Briar | 3–4–0 | 7 | 42.9% | 15.8–75.0% |
| Azalea | Enigma | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Benji, the Piercing Wind | Dromai | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Benji, the Piercing Wind | Enigma | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Briar | 5–7–0 | 12 | 41.7% | 19.3–68.0% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Enigma | 2–6–0 | 8 | 25.0% | 7.2–59.1% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Fai | 2–5–0 | 7 | 28.6% | 8.2–64.1% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Iyslander | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Oldhim | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Olympia | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Blaze, Firemind | Oscilio | 0–4–0 | 4 | 0.0% | 0.0–49.0% |
| Boltyn | Dromai | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Briar | 6–3–0 | 9 | 66.7% | 35.4–87.9% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Dromai | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Fai | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Oldhim | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Olympia | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Oscilio | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Briar | Aurora | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Briar | Azalea | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% |
| Briar | Blaze, Firemind | 7–5–0 | 12 | 58.3% | 31.9–80.7% |
| Briar | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 3–6–0 | 9 | 33.3% | 12.1–64.6% |
| Briar | Briar | 0–0–23 | 23 | 50.0% | 31.1–68.9% |
| Briar | Chane | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Briar | Dash | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% |
| Briar | Dorinthea | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% |
| Briar | Dromai | 10–15–0 | 25 | 40.0% | 23.4–59.3% |
| Briar | Enigma | 8–10–0 | 18 | 44.4% | 24.6–66.3% |
| Briar | Fai | 8–4–0 | 12 | 66.7% | 39.1–86.2% |
| Briar | Iyslander | 4–5–0 | 9 | 44.4% | 18.9–73.3% |
| Briar | Levia | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Briar | Oldhim | 2–9–0 | 11 | 18.2% | 5.1–47.7% |
| Briar | Olympia | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% |
| Briar | Oscilio | 7–11–0 | 18 | 38.9% | 20.3–61.4% |
| Briar | Rhinar | 6–3–0 | 9 | 66.7% | 35.4–87.9% |
| Briar | Zen | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Chane | Briar | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Chane | Dromai | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Chane | Fai | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Dash | Briar | 1–4–0 | 5 | 20.0% | 3.6–62.5% |
| Dorinthea | Briar | 3–4–0 | 7 | 42.9% | 15.8–75.0% |
| Dorinthea | Oscilio | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Dromai | Aurora | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Dromai | Benji, the Piercing Wind | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Dromai | Boltyn | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Dromai | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 1–4–0 | 5 | 20.0% | 3.6–62.5% |
| Dromai | Briar | 15–10–0 | 25 | 60.0% | 40.7–76.6% |
| Dromai | Chane | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Dromai | Enigma | 6–0–0 | 6 | 100.0% | 61.0–100.0% |
| Dromai | Fai | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Dromai | Lexi | 4–2–0 | 6 | 66.7% | 30.0–90.3% |
| Dromai | Oldhim | 5–6–0 | 11 | 45.5% | 21.3–72.0% |
| Dromai | Olympia | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Dromai | Oscilio | 5–4–0 | 9 | 55.6% | 26.7–81.1% |
| Enigma | Azalea | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Enigma | Benji, the Piercing Wind | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Enigma | Blaze, Firemind | 6–2–0 | 8 | 75.0% | 40.9–92.8% |
| Enigma | Briar | 10–8–0 | 18 | 55.6% | 33.7–75.4% |
| Enigma | Dromai | 0–6–0 | 6 | 0.0% | 0.0–39.0% |
| Enigma | Iyslander | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Enigma | Oldhim | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Enigma | Oscilio | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% |
| Enigma | Rhinar | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
| Fai | Blaze, Firemind | 5–2–0 | 7 | 71.4% | 35.9–91.8% |
| Fai | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Fai | Briar | 4–8–0 | 12 | 33.3% | 13.8–60.9% |
| Fai | Chane | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Fai | Dromai | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Fai | Fai | 0–0–3 | 3 | 50.0% | 12.5–87.5% |
| Fai | Oscilio | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Iyslander | Blaze, Firemind | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% |
| Iyslander | Briar | 5–4–0 | 9 | 55.6% | 26.7–81.1% |
| Iyslander | Enigma | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Iyslander | Oldhim | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
| Iyslander | Oscilio | 1–4–0 | 5 | 20.0% | 3.6–62.5% |
| Iyslander | Rhinar | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Levia | Briar | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Lexi | Dromai | 2–4–0 | 6 | 33.3% | 9.7–70.0% |
| Oldhim | Blaze, Firemind | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Oldhim | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Oldhim | Briar | 9–2–0 | 11 | 81.8% | 52.3–94.9% |
| Oldhim | Dromai | 6–5–0 | 11 | 54.5% | 28.0–78.7% |
| Oldhim | Enigma | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
| Oldhim | Iyslander | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Oldhim | Oscilio | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% |
| Olympia | Blaze, Firemind | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Olympia | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Olympia | Briar | 2–3–0 | 5 | 40.0% | 11.8–76.9% |
| Olympia | Dromai | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% |
| Olympia | Oscilio | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Oscilio | Blaze, Firemind | 4–0–0 | 4 | 100.0% | 51.0–100.0% |
| Oscilio | Bravo, Flattering Showman | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Oscilio | Briar | 11–7–0 | 18 | 61.1% | 38.6–79.7% |
| Oscilio | Dorinthea | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
| Oscilio | Dromai | 4–5–0 | 9 | 44.4% | 18.9–73.3% |
| Oscilio | Enigma | 2–3–0 | 5 | 40.0% | 11.8–76.9% |
| Oscilio | Fai | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Oscilio | Iyslander | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% |
| Oscilio | Oldhim | 2–3–0 | 5 | 40.0% | 11.8–76.9% |
| Oscilio | Olympia | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Oscilio | Pleiades | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% |
| Oscilio | Rhinar | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Pleiades | Oscilio | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% |
| Rhinar | Briar | 3–6–0 | 9 | 33.3% | 12.1–64.6% |
| Rhinar | Enigma | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% |
| Rhinar | Iyslander | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% |
| Rhinar | Oscilio | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
| Zen | Briar | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% |
Across the local archive
Event comparison
Head to head
Briar event-specific versus pooled matchups
| Opponent | Scope | Record | Matches | Win rate | 95% interval | Event variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dromai | Pooled · 2 events | 21–33–0 | 54 | 38.9% | 27.0–52.2% | 37.9–40.0% · σ 1.0 |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Pooled · 2 events | 20–21–2 | 43 | 48.8% | 34.6–63.2% | 33.3–52.9% · σ 9.8 |
| Oscilio | Pooled · 2 events | 16–25–0 | 41 | 39.0% | 25.7–54.3% | 38.9–39.1% · σ 0.1 |
| Fai | Pooled · 2 events | 27–12–0 | 39 | 69.2% | 53.6–81.4% | 66.7–70.4% · σ 1.9 |
| Enigma | Pooled · 2 events | 17–16–3 | 36 | 51.4% | 35.7–66.8% | 44.4–58.3% · σ 7.0 |
| Blaze, Firemind | Pooled · 2 events | 12–13–0 | 25 | 48.0% | 30.0–66.5% | 38.5–58.3% · σ 9.9 |
| Oldhim | Pooled · 2 events | 3–15–0 | 18 | 16.7% | 5.8–39.2% | 14.3–18.2% · σ 1.9 |
| Iyslander | Pooled · 2 events | 9–8–0 | 17 | 52.9% | 31.0–73.8% | 44.4–62.5% · σ 9.0 |
| Rhinar | Pooled · 2 events | 11–4–0 | 15 | 73.3% | 48.0–89.1% | 66.7–83.3% · σ 8.3 |
| Dorinthea | Pooled · 2 events | 9–3–0 | 12 | 75.0% | 46.8–91.1% | 57.1–100.0% · σ 21.4 |
| Lexi | Pooled · 2 events | 5–7–0 | 12 | 41.7% | 19.3–68.0% | 40.0–50.0% · σ 5.0 |
| Azalea | Pooled · 2 events | 6–4–0 | 10 | 60.0% | 31.3–83.2% | 57.1–66.7% · σ 4.8 |
| Dash | Pooled · 2 events | 8–2–0 | 10 | 80.0% | 49.0–94.3% | 80.0–80.0% · σ 0.0 |
| Florian | Pooled · 2 events | 6–2–0 | 8 | 75.0% | 40.9–92.8% | 50.0–83.3% · σ 16.7 |
| Olympia | Pooled · 2 events | 3–5–0 | 8 | 37.5% | 13.7–69.4% | 0.0–60.0% · σ 30.0 |
| Chane | Pooled · 2 events | 3–3–0 | 6 | 50.0% | 18.8–81.2% | 50.0–50.0% · σ 0.0 |
| Aurora | Pooled · 2 events | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% | 75.0–100.0% · σ 12.5 |
| Hala | Pooled · 2 events | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% | 33.3–100.0% · σ 33.3 |
| Riptide | Pooled · 2 events | 2–3–0 | 5 | 40.0% | 11.8–76.9% | 25.0–100.0% · σ 37.5 |
| Valda Brightaxe | Pooled · 1 event | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% | 60.0–60.0% · σ 0.0 |
| Levia | Pooled · 1 event | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% | 25.0–25.0% · σ 0.0 |
| Boltyn | Pooled · 1 event | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% | 66.7–66.7% · σ 0.0 |
| Zen | Pooled · 1 event | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% | 100.0–100.0% · σ 0.0 |
| Arakni, Solitary Confinement | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 0–1–0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0–79.3% | Individual event |
| Aurora | CALLING BANGKOK · low sample | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% | Individual event |
| Aurora | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 3–1–0 | 4 | 75.0% | 30.1–95.4% | Individual event |
| Azalea | CALLING BANGKOK | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% | Individual event |
| Azalea | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% | Individual event |
| Blaze, Firemind | CALLING BANGKOK | 5–8–0 | 13 | 38.5% | 17.7–64.5% | Individual event |
| Blaze, Firemind | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 7–5–0 | 12 | 58.3% | 31.9–80.7% | Individual event |
| Boltyn | CALLING BANGKOK | 2–1–0 | 3 | 66.7% | 20.8–93.8% | Individual event |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | CALLING BANGKOK | 17–15–2 | 34 | 52.9% | 36.7–68.5% | Individual event |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 3–6–0 | 9 | 33.3% | 12.1–64.6% | Individual event |
| Chane | CALLING BANGKOK · low sample | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% | Individual event |
| Chane | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 2–2–0 | 4 | 50.0% | 15.0–85.0% | Individual event |
| Dash | CALLING BANGKOK | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% | Individual event |
| Dash | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 4–1–0 | 5 | 80.0% | 37.5–96.4% | Individual event |
| Dorinthea | CALLING BANGKOK | 5–0–0 | 5 | 100.0% | 56.5–100.0% | Individual event |
| Dorinthea | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 4–3–0 | 7 | 57.1% | 25.1–84.2% | Individual event |
| Dromai | CALLING BANGKOK | 11–18–0 | 29 | 37.9% | 22.7–56.0% | Individual event |
| Dromai | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 10–15–0 | 25 | 40.0% | 23.4–59.3% | Individual event |
| Enigma | CALLING BANGKOK | 9–6–3 | 18 | 58.3% | 36.1–77.6% | Individual event |
| Enigma | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 8–10–0 | 18 | 44.4% | 24.6–66.3% | Individual event |
| Fai | CALLING BANGKOK | 19–8–0 | 27 | 70.4% | 51.5–84.2% | Individual event |
| Fai | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 8–4–0 | 12 | 66.7% | 39.1–86.2% | Individual event |
| Florian | CALLING BANGKOK | 5–1–0 | 6 | 83.3% | 43.6–97.0% | Individual event |
| Florian | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% | Individual event |
| Gravy Bones | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% | Individual event |
| Hala | CALLING BANGKOK | 1–2–0 | 3 | 33.3% | 6.2–79.2% | Individual event |
| Hala | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 2–0–0 | 2 | 100.0% | 34.2–100.0% | Individual event |
| Iyslander | CALLING BANGKOK | 5–3–0 | 8 | 62.5% | 30.6–86.3% | Individual event |
| Iyslander | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 4–5–0 | 9 | 44.4% | 18.9–73.3% | Individual event |
| Jarl Vetreiði | Calling Edinburgh · low sample | 0–1–0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0–79.3% | Individual event |
| Kayo, Strong-arm | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% | Individual event |
| Levia | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% | Individual event |
| Lexi | CALLING BANGKOK | 4–6–0 | 10 | 40.0% | 16.8–68.7% | Individual event |
| Lexi | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% | Individual event |
| Lyath Goldmane | CALLING BANGKOK · low sample | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% | Individual event |
| Oldhim | CALLING BANGKOK | 1–6–0 | 7 | 14.3% | 2.6–51.3% | Individual event |
| Oldhim | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 2–9–0 | 11 | 18.2% | 5.1–47.7% | Individual event |
| Olympia | CALLING BANGKOK | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% | Individual event |
| Olympia | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% | Individual event |
| Oscilio | CALLING BANGKOK | 9–14–0 | 23 | 39.1% | 22.2–59.2% | Individual event |
| Oscilio | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 7–11–0 | 18 | 38.9% | 20.3–61.4% | Individual event |
| Rhinar | CALLING BANGKOK | 5–1–0 | 6 | 83.3% | 43.6–97.0% | Individual event |
| Rhinar | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 6–3–0 | 9 | 66.7% | 35.4–87.9% | Individual event |
| Riptide | CALLING BANGKOK | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% | Individual event |
| Riptide | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–0–0 | 1 | 100.0% | 20.6–100.0% | Individual event |
| Terra | Sunday Showdown Kansas City · low sample | 1–1–0 | 2 | 50.0% | 9.4–90.5% | Individual event |
| Valda Brightaxe | CALLING BANGKOK | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% | Individual event |
| Viserai | CALLING BANGKOK · low sample | 2–0–0 | 2 | 100.0% | 34.2–100.0% | Individual event |
| Zen | Sunday Showdown Kansas City | 3–0–0 | 3 | 100.0% | 43.9–100.0% | Individual event |
Confirmed milestones
Conversion across events
| Event | Cut | Started | Advanced | Conversion | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALLING BANGKOK | DAY2 · R8 | 36 | 12 | 33.3% | 1.14× |
| Calling Edinburgh | DAY2 · R8 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00× |
| CALLING BANGKOK | TOP8 · R12 | 36 | 2 | 5.6% | 1.07× |
| Calling Edinburgh | TOP8 · R12 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00× |
| Sunday Showdown Kansas City | TOP8 · R8 | 39 | 17 | 43.6% | 1.11× |
Formats
Format-specific performance
| Format | Record | Matches | Weighted win rate | Events | Event range / σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver Age | 200–188–5 | 393 | 51.5% | 2 | 50.0–52.7% / 1.4 |
All heroes
Sample-weighted aggregate performance
| Hero | Record | Matches | Weighted win rate | 95% interval | Events | Event mean | Event range | Event σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oscilio, Constella Intelligence | 982–770–5 | 1757 | 56.0% | 53.7–58.3% | 5 | 60.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 26.9 |
| Arakni, Marionette | 846–735–14 | 1595 | 53.5% | 51.0–55.9% | 5 | 57.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 26.4 |
| Jarl Vetreiði | 532–516–21 | 1069 | 50.8% | 47.8–53.7% | 5 | 51.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 31.9 |
| Kassai of the Golden Sand | 511–446–15 | 972 | 53.3% | 50.2–56.5% | 5 | 58.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 33.7 |
| Dash I/O | 421–424–1 | 846 | 49.8% | 46.5–53.2% | 5 | 51.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 31.5 |
| Cindra, Dracai of Retribution | 363–357–0 | 720 | 50.4% | 46.8–54.1% | 5 | 51.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 31.4 |
| Gravy Bones, Shipwrecked Looter | 353–355–11 | 719 | 49.9% | 46.2–53.5% | 5 | 52.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 34.8 |
| Arakni, Huntsman | 297–253–11 | 561 | 53.9% | 49.8–58.0% | 5 | 53.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 35.5 |
| Vynnset, Iron Maiden | 234–307–3 | 544 | 43.3% | 39.2–47.5% | 5 | 45.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 33.0 |
| Zyggy Starlight | 237–245–4 | 486 | 49.2% | 44.8–53.6% | 5 | 47.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 36.9 |
| Fai, Rising Rebellion | 227–242–0 | 469 | 48.4% | 43.9–52.9% | 5 | 50.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 36.5 |
| Hala, Bladesaint of the Vow | 206–224–11 | 441 | 48.0% | 43.3–52.6% | 5 | 51.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 35.6 |
| Briar | 200–189–5 | 394 | 51.4% | 46.5–56.3% | 3 | 56.7% | 0.0–100.0% | 27.5 |
| Betsy, Skin in the Game | 210–174–8 | 392 | 54.6% | 49.6–59.5% | 5 | 59.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.3 |
| Valda, Seismic Impact | 163–221–1 | 385 | 42.5% | 37.6–47.5% | 5 | 41.7% | 0.0–100.0% | 38.4 |
| Aurora, Legacy of Tempest | 172–195–0 | 367 | 46.9% | 41.8–52.0% | 5 | 49.8% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.2 |
| Rhinar, Reckless Rampage | 153–194–1 | 348 | 44.1% | 39.0–49.4% | 5 | 42.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 37.2 |
| Dorinthea Ironsong | 153–169–5 | 327 | 47.5% | 42.2–53.0% | 5 | 49.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 37.5 |
| Puffin, Hightail | 142–173–2 | 317 | 45.1% | 39.7–50.6% | 5 | 50.8% | 0.0–100.0% | 38.8 |
| Ira, Scarlet Revenger | 138–143–3 | 284 | 49.1% | 43.4–54.9% | 5 | 46.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 38.2 |
| Fang, Dracai of Blades | 127–142–3 | 272 | 47.2% | 41.4–53.2% | 5 | 51.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.1 |
| Marlynn, Treasure Hunter | 111–139–3 | 253 | 44.5% | 38.5–50.6% | 5 | 46.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.2 |
| Katsu, the Wanderer | 105–118–1 | 224 | 47.1% | 40.7–53.6% | 5 | 51.6% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.7 |
| Teklovossen, Esteemed Magnate | 111–91–4 | 206 | 54.9% | 48.0–61.5% | 5 | 56.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.6 |
| Dromai | 109–85–1 | 195 | 56.1% | 49.1–62.9% | 2 | 58.8% | 0.0–100.0% | 31.0 |
| Arakni, 5L!p3d 7hRu 7h3 cR4X | 80–88–0 | 168 | 47.6% | 40.2–55.1% | 5 | 50.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 41.9 |
| Oscilio | 96–61–1 | 158 | 61.1% | 53.3–68.3% | 3 | 65.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 34.9 |
| Fai | 66–81–0 | 147 | 44.9% | 37.1–53.0% | 3 | 49.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 37.3 |
| Bravo, Flattering Showman | 73–67–3 | 143 | 52.1% | 44.0–60.1% | 2 | 53.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 36.3 |
| Enigma | 75–62–3 | 140 | 54.6% | 46.4–62.7% | 2 | 59.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.7 |
| Riptide, Lurker of the Deep | 69–70–1 | 140 | 49.6% | 41.5–57.8% | 4 | 53.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.4 |
| Tuffnut, Bumbling Hulkster | 47–90–1 | 138 | 34.4% | 27.0–42.7% | 5 | 37.6% | 0.0–100.0% | 43.5 |
| Olympia, Prized Fighter | 60–71–3 | 134 | 45.9% | 37.7–54.3% | 3 | 45.7% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.1 |
| Ser Boltyn, Breaker of Dawn | 54–70–2 | 126 | 43.6% | 35.3–52.4% | 5 | 47.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 43.4 |
| Kayo, Underhanded Cheat | 55–64–1 | 120 | 46.2% | 37.6–55.1% | 5 | 48.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 44.4 |
| Blaze, Firemind | 42–54–0 | 96 | 43.8% | 34.3–53.7% | 2 | 47.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.2 |
| Oldhim | 46–40–2 | 88 | 53.4% | 43.1–63.5% | 2 | 52.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 41.3 |
| Lyath Goldmane, Vile Savant | 28–38–4 | 70 | 42.9% | 31.9–54.5% | 5 | 39.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 45.7 |
| Iyslander | 29–36–0 | 65 | 44.6% | 33.2–56.7% | 2 | 53.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.3 |
| Levia, Shadowborn Abomination | 25–38–1 | 64 | 39.8% | 28.8–52.1% | 4 | 43.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 45.6 |
| Rhinar | 28–35–0 | 63 | 44.4% | 32.9–56.7% | 2 | 39.6% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.3 |
| Dorinthea | 27–31–0 | 58 | 46.5% | 34.3–59.2% | 2 | 54.6% | 0.0–100.0% | 44.3 |
| Maxx 'The Hype' Nitro | 21–35–0 | 56 | 37.5% | 26.0–50.6% | 5 | 36.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 46.4 |
| Pleiades, Superstar | 16–32–6 | 54 | 35.2% | 23.8–48.5% | 5 | 34.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.0 |
| Lexi | 21–29–0 | 50 | 42.0% | 29.4–55.8% | 2 | 31.8% | 0.0–100.0% | 36.5 |
| Olympia | 26–24–0 | 50 | 52.0% | 38.5–65.2% | 2 | 57.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.2 |
| Oscilio, Scion of the Third Age | 21–27–0 | 48 | 43.8% | 30.7–57.7% | 1 | 37.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 41.4 |
| Aurora, Emissary of Lightning | 26–18–0 | 44 | 59.1% | 44.4–72.3% | 1 | 63.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 32.1 |
| Zyggy | 17–27–0 | 44 | 38.6% | 25.7–53.4% | 1 | 44.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 43.7 |
| Azalea | 17–21–0 | 38 | 44.7% | 30.1–60.3% | 2 | 46.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.8 |
| Aurora | 19–18–0 | 37 | 51.4% | 35.9–66.5% | 3 | 57.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 45.4 |
| Florian | 14–20–0 | 34 | 41.2% | 26.4–57.8% | 2 | 46.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 44.4 |
| Dash | 12–20–0 | 32 | 37.5% | 22.9–54.8% | 2 | 40.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 44.8 |
| Chane | 13–15–0 | 28 | 46.4% | 29.5–64.2% | 2 | 42.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 43.0 |
| Bravo, Showstopper | 10–15–0 | 25 | 40.0% | 23.4–59.3% | 3 | 42.7% | 0.0–100.0% | 46.4 |
| Valda Brightaxe | 11–11–0 | 22 | 50.0% | 30.7–69.3% | 1 | 58.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 42.5 |
| Boltyn | 5–14–1 | 20 | 27.5% | 12.8–49.4% | 2 | 26.2% | 0.0–100.0% | 35.5 |
| Levia | 9–10–0 | 19 | 47.4% | 27.3–68.3% | 2 | 41.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 43.9 |
| Riptide | 7–11–1 | 19 | 39.5% | 21.1–61.4% | 2 | 28.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 39.0 |
| Hala | 10–8–0 | 18 | 55.6% | 33.7–75.4% | 2 | 61.1% | 0.0–100.0% | 44.8 |
| Benji, the Piercing Wind | 11–4–0 | 15 | 73.3% | 48.0–89.1% | 1 | 77.4% | 50.0–100.0% | 21.2 |
| Uzuri, Switchblade | 6–6–0 | 12 | 50.0% | 25.4–74.6% | 2 | 45.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 49.8 |
| Oscilio, Forked Continuum | 2–9–0 | 11 | 18.2% | 5.1–47.7% | 1 | 20.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.0 |
| Zen | 5–6–0 | 11 | 45.5% | 21.3–72.0% | 1 | 50.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 46.3 |
| Terra | 2–6–1 | 9 | 27.8% | 9.0–59.8% | 1 | 33.3% | 0.0–100.0% | 37.3 |
| Arakni, Solitary Confinement | 6–2–0 | 8 | 75.0% | 40.9–92.8% | 1 | 71.4% | 0.0–100.0% | 45.2 |
| Nuu | 4–4–0 | 8 | 50.0% | 21.5–78.5% | 1 | 42.9% | 0.0–100.0% | 49.5 |
| Viserai | 1–6–0 | 7 | 14.3% | 2.6–51.3% | 1 | 20.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.0 |
| Gravy Bones | 1–5–0 | 6 | 16.7% | 3.0–56.4% | 2 | 16.7% | 0.0–100.0% | 37.3 |
| Lyath Goldmane | 2–4–0 | 6 | 33.3% | 9.7–70.0% | 1 | 37.5% | 0.0–100.0% | 41.5 |
| Dorinthea, Quicksilver Prodigy | 1–4–0 | 5 | 20.0% | 3.6–62.5% | 1 | 20.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 40.0 |
| Kayo, Strong-arm | 3–2–0 | 5 | 60.0% | 23.1–88.2% | 1 | 50.0% | 0.0–100.0% | 50.0 |
| Pleiades | 1–3–0 | 4 | 25.0% | 4.6–69.9% | 1 | 16.7% | 0.0–33.3% | 16.7 |
| Bravo | 0–3–0 | 3 | 0.0% | 0.0–56.1% | 1 | 0.0% | 0.0–0.0% | 0.0 |
Trust and provenance
Data quality
| Started | Status | Pages | Added | Changed | Removed | Unchanged | Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-31T00:03:12+00:00 | success | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 2026-08-30T21:52:00+00:00 | success | 32 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 9 | |
| 2026-08-30T20:55:36+00:00 | success | 32 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2026-08-30T20:18:57+00:00 | failed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ParseError: Match page contains no results table. |
Round source state
| Round | Format | Status | Current |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 2 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 3 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 4 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 5 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 6 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 7 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 8 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 9 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 10 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |
| 11 | Silver Age | complete | Yes |